Skip to main content

Freedom of Speech

 


    The class discussion we had on freedom of speech today was intriguing. 

    From my own experiences in the past as well as from talking to friends and family members, I have noticed that in classes involving general debate or argument (english, history, etc.), a heavy bias is pushed towards one side of the argument with a lack of tolerance or even recognition for the other side. The "other side" oftentimes tends to be my side and it can be difficult to share that. 

    Certain views sound terrible when first presented (ex: we need to lower the minimum wage), but there is legitimate logic behind views like these. I don't want to "make people poor", but without discussing the rationale behind my view it may seem like this to some people. This isn't what happened in my case, but I have seen it happen to other people in other classes with other topics and it isn't right. Automatically shooting down certain statements without explanation isn't lack of tolerance, it's blatant censorship disguised as lack of tolerance. Not being open to understanding or respectfully discussing it is hurtful to the class environment as well as the student with said opinion.

    In high school, I read 1984 by George Orwell and it was eye opening to me how comparisons from that book can be drawn to today. Obviously not to the same extent as in the book, but in school as well as society in general, one view tends to be pushed fairly often and those who don't agree are "cancelled". We need to realize that just because the majority doesn't agree with a view doesn't mean it's automatically invalid or not worthy of being explained.

    Freedom of speech isn't free until lack of tolerance doesn't become an excuse for censorship in general discussion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Freshman Year Reflection

      Going into my freshman year of college after graduating high school, I had a lot of uncertainties. People go in different directions after graduating and I wasn't sure if the path I was planning was sufficient compared to my peers.     Mainly, I wasn't sure if I was making the right decision by choosing North Central. Most of my friends chose to go to schools far from home for the "college experience"/partying, which is something I've never been into. I've always had the goal of graduating college debt-free, so I made sure to pick a school where I could commute and afford it without having to take out loans. After picking North Central, I was happy because it was a great school that I could afford and stay close to my family while attending, but other people didn't agree with my decision. I got made fun of by peers who expected me to go to an "elite" university because of my good grades and was told time and time again that I was going to m...

Deep Water Documentary

    The film Deep Water tells the true story of Donald Crowhurst, a British man with no sailing experience, who enters a nonstop boat race around the world in 1968. The documentary mainly utilizes pathos to develop a sorrowful viewpoint regarding Crowhurst's mindset in competing in the race as well as how he "finishes" the race. 1.)  The scene that really got to me was when Crowhurst started faking his position in the race to the British media in order to give them hope that he was overcoming the odds against him when in reality he wasn't. This ended up crushing him because he created a false expectation for himself which ultimately drove him into insanity. This scene made me angry and sad because he started to lose his mind obsessing over the race and trying to cheat his way out and sad because he had a family at home and had completely disregarded them in order to try and prove that he could do the extreme. Essentially he was giving everyone (including himself) fals...